Recitals
Recital 75
Recital 75
Reasoned Objection and Review by the Competent Court Unofficial title
Where an addressee considers that a European Production Order in a specific case would entail the violation of a legal obligation deriving from the law of a third country, it should inform the issuing authority and the enforcing authority of its reasons for not executing the order by way of a reasoned objection, using the form provided for in this Regulation. The issuing authority should review the European Production Order on the basis of the reasoned objection and any input provided by the enforcing State, taking into account the same criteria that the competent court of the issuing State would have to follow. Where the issuing authority intends to uphold the order, it should request a review by the competent court of the issuing State, as notified by the relevant Member State, which should review the order.
https://e-evidence.digiphile.law/recital/recital-75.html
Text as at 5 November 2026.
This is an unofficial convenience version of the EU e-Evidence Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1543). It is presented “as is” without guarantee of accuracy, completeness or reliability. See the source text for the official version. This site was last updated in November 2026.